Google's Next Stop: Your TV

TVGoogle announced a new ad distribution system today, Google TV Ads. Using the existing AdWords system, users can now create television commercials and manage them alongside their online campaigns. The commercials will run on selected TV stations, during time segments that users specify. If you're not sure which stations are right for your ads, there is even a suggest by demographic function that will match your target demographics with TV stations and time segments that would best fit your target viewers. Going even more in depth, users can target a specific program to advertise on or block if they feel that specific programs fit or don't fit into their strategy. Since this utilizes the easy to use AdWords system, television ads are now open to a whole new segment of advertisers who may not have had the opportunity in the past.

TV ads are already starting to encourage people to go online and search for their brand, so this is an interesting way to bring internet and traditional media advertising even closer together. With search, radio, mobile, print and now television ads, Google is helping to promote the idea that in order to market successfully you need to consider all possible avenues to reach your target audience.

Asking For Answers

I have long considered Ask.com to be the little search engine that could. They didn't have the legacy audience of Yahoo, the endless budget of MSN (or Live if you prefer), nor did they have the technology and overall popularity of Google. What they did have was an urge to innovate. Ask incorporated an all-in-one search format, binoculars to preview websites, a map system that in my opinion surpasses even Google Maps in terms of usability and neat features, and special current events callout boxes on results pages. All of this should have lead to an expanding user base. But there was a problem.

Ask's marketing strategy has been questionable for quite a while now. Ask used to be called Ask Jeeves. In early 2006 the Jeeves character "retired" perhaps in an attempt to shed the goofy cartoon image of a butler serving you search results. I thought the butler was a nice touch, but in any case. "The Algorithm" became the new marketing focus for Ask, which touted a new and intelligent system to produce search results for users. Billboards went up around the country, some of which drew the wrong kind of attention.

Ask.com billboard

Invoking the name of someone like the Unabomber is perhaps not the best idea when advertising a website. Ask then put a series of TV commercials out, the most notorious two being focused on Kato Kaelin and "chicks with swords". The attempt to be wacky and memorable backfired as search discussion blogs exploded with negative reactions and Ask apologists were left "searching" for answers. For a search engine with less than 5% market share Ask seemed to be making bizarre decisions.

The most recent misstep was an Associated Press Announcement that Ask was firing 8% of their staff and was re-tooling to be a site tailored specifically to married women in the Southeast and Midwest. The next day Ask apparently refuted the claim and said they would not sacrifice general users to appeal to a specific subset. The main problem is that in this internet age news spreads like wildfire. I read the story of Ask's restructuring on more than 10 websites, but only found the supposed retraction on one. With all the buzz and discussion of the validity of these stories, Ask has produced no official position on their blog or in a press release. Even if the story was a mistake, the impact of a splashy headline all over the internet has done its damage.

If we can learn anything from the rocky marketing history of Ask it is that reputation management is of paramount importance on the net. With the constant rush of information users are presented with you might only get one chance to change someone's mind. Make it count.

Getting to Knol You

It's no secret that Google loves Wikipedia. The benefits of having dubious freely editable information rank first in the most popular search engine has been evaluated for quite a while, but I have to wonder how long that tawdry affair is going to last with Google's Knol looming on the horizon.

At the moment the service is in closed beta, but the idea looks to be part Wikipedia, part Squidoo. One expert user creates a page (a "lens" to represent your view in Squidoo, a "knol" or unit of knowledge in Knol) on a specific topic that can be edited by others, but only with the expert user's permission. In theory this would allow moderators to have a narrower focus than Wiki admins, and would prevent unchecked nonsense from being added while maintaining a social atmosphere. I'm interested to see if Knol will be better received than Squidoo, which got a perhaps unfair label as a haven for spammers who create lenses as advertisements passed off as authoritative information.

The other thing we know is Google loves Google. In all those examples the Google service snags the #1 spot, along with the top ad spot (and in some cases securing multiple ad spots on the first page). So then what will happen once Knols start propagating through the system? Will a Google / Wiki 1-2 punch become the standard for the front page of every search result? Ultimately the quality of information on those Knols and Wikipedia pages will either create or prevent public backlash, but if websites with a singular focus can’t reach the top of their subject’s rankings because they aren’t “in” with Google, it might raise a few eyebrows.

This site is running a Congruent Media enhanced version of BlogCFC 5.9.002. Contact Blog Owner